What should be the extent of rights for employees?

 What should be the extent of rights for employees? 

According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, employees have a right to not be treated less favorably because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, age, or genetic information, receive equal pay for equal work. Although corporations may gain some challenges due to these regulations, this is also an opportunity to increase their efficiency and production. How? Why? Remember that CSR(corporate social responsibility) benefits entrepreneurs in multiple ways. If we consider the extent of rights for employees as a kind of CSR, it may have many advantages that can apply to any business, regardless of its size includes better brand recognition, positive business reputation, increased sales and customer loyalty, better financial performance, and most importantly, greater ability to attract talent and retain staff which connects directly to the extent of rights for employees. Being a responsible, sustainable business may make it easier to recruit new employees or retain existing ones. Employees may be motivated to stay longer, thus reducing the costs and disruption of recruitment and retraining.

Should an employer be able to terminate an employee at will? 

This question is about balance and freedom. Most employers think they should have the freedom to fire anyone for any reason. However, if we put the laws and the regulations aside, business owners are still liable to take good care of their employees. Why? Because good relationships with employees will make an enterprise even stronger. What Google learned from Goodwill, is that be a good boss and you will attract and keep good workers. Therefore, I reckon that an employer should not terminate an employee at will unless it is necessary. An excellent organization is the result of joint efforts and is also responsible for many families since it provides income. If someone tends to hold it back, it affects and harms those families. So, sometimes it is considered a necessary decision rather than at will. Just like many regulations are for the public good, many people still have to switch their jobs to what they can do best. The environment is changing quickly, changing your skills to adopt it is unavoidable.

What are some potential employer abuses the government should protect employees from?

Most of the abuses that employees could suffer caused by their employers include rejection of a job, being fired or getting your shifts reduced, deny promotion, and not being paid equally. Although the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces federal laws banning discrimination in the hiring, firing, salaries, and benefits of job applicants and employees in several work circumstances, employees are less willing to report those issues since they are on the higher side of the scale. So, if governments truly want to protect employees from abuses, it is not enough to only set up regulations. For example, I am pretty sure hiring and firing are both can be "reasonably managed", right? We have seen many unfortunate cases. Rather than just make statements and laws, governments must build a reward system to trigger businesses to actively provide a good working environment and continually keep CSR in the heart of their corporate culture.

Reference

Employee rights. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Retrieved December 18, 2021, from https://www.eeoc.gov/employers/small-business/employee-rights