Introduction
In this chapter, we learn inventory in greater detail. Obviously, inventory is a significant asset on the balance sheet. Therefore, it must be a standard principle for assigning value to it. In reality, not all firms operating exactly the same way, thus the methods are also different.
Recall My Favorite Local Merchants from Units 5 and 6.
There's a bookstore chain called "Eslite Bookstore (https://www.eslitecorp.com/eslite/index.jsp)" who sells books and stationery in where I live.
What inventory valuation method would you advise them to use?
To do this suggestion, we must understand what inventory they are dealing with and digging some history of this industry. In this case, the store purchases multiple books for inventory to sell, and the merchandise that the bookstore stocks are books. Although there are so many electronic gadgets and apps such as Kindle Fire(Amazon), iPad, or other forms of e-books that tend to replace traditional books, they do not work as easily as they thought before. Traditional book sales still stand out in these modern days, regardless the prices are normally way more expensive than the electronic version(Pdf or word). We can not definitely predict the future, we only predict it probably. I suppose that if the resources for printing physical books are all on an increasing trend, and either the cost of owning a physical bookstore, then the prices of physical books are also on an increasing trend. Therefore, I advise them to use the LIFO (Last In, First Out) method to produce lower income on the financial reports and creating an increasing trend of the income statement.
Why?
Before we actually choose a mothod, we can do some comparison. Assume their business activities as the samples below:
Sample :
Day 1. Beginning Inventory = 200,000 books ($8 per book) = $1,600,000
Day 2. Net purchase 200,000 books ($10 per book) on Jan 31, 2020
Day 3. Net sales = 300,000 books at $30 each = $9,000,000
Day 4. Net purchase another 200,000 books ($12 per book)
Day 5. Net sales = 100,000 books at $30 each = $3,000,000
Based on the given information, we can do the calculate the cost of goods sold as below:
LIFO (Last In, First Out):
On the day 3, the cost of goods sold was $2,800,000 ( = 200,000 X $10 + 100,000 X $8 )
On the day 5, the cost of goods sold was $1,200,000 ( = 100,000 X $12 )
The total cost of goods sold = $2,800,000 + $1,200,000 = $4,000,000
The total net sales = $9,000,000 + $3,000,000 = $12,000,000
The gross profit = The Total Net Sales - Cost of goods sold = $12,000,000 - $4,000,000 = $8,000,000
FIFO (First In, First Out):
On the day 3, the cost of goods sold was $2,600,000 ( = 200,000 X $8 + 100,000 X $10 )
On the day 5, the cost of goods sold was $1,000,000 ( = 100,000 X $10 )
The total cost of goods sold = $2,600,000 + $1,000,000 = $3,600,000
The total net sales = $9,000,000 + $3,000,000 = $12,000,000
The gross profit = The Total Net Sales - Cost of goods sold = $12,000,000 - $3,600,000 = $8,400,000
Weighted Average:
The average cost on day 3 was = $9 ((200,000 x $8 + 200,000 x $10)/400,000)
On the day 3, the cost of goods sold was $2,700,000 ( = 300,000 X $9 )
The average cost on day 5 was = $11.33 ((100,000 x $10 + 200,000 x $12)/300,000)
On the day 5, the cost of goods sold was $1,133,000 ( = 100,000 X $11.33 )
The total cost of goods sold = $2,700,000 + $1,133,000 = $3,830,000
The total net sales = $9,000,000 + $3,000,000 = $12,000,000
The gross profit = The Total Net Sales - Cost of goods sold = $12,000,000 - $3,830,000 = $8,170,000
As a result, the LIFO (Last In, First Out) method produces the lowest profit while the cost of books is on an increasing trend. If we do the opposite of calculations, the amounts of FIFO and LIFO will be quite the opposite. The weighted average will be somewhere in between. Although the LIFO (Last In, First Out) method produces the lowest profit, it reflects the most recently incurred costs with the recently generated revenues. Lower profit also reduces the cost of the tax payments while the cost of books is on an increasing trend.
Assume the tax rate is 20% times the Gross profit. The tax bills will be $1,600,000(LIFO), $1,680,000(FIFO), and $1,634,000(Weighted Average) as we sold exactly the same amounts of books.
Specific Identification Method
As we learned during this chapter, another method is the specific identification method, which requires the bookstore to identify each book with its cost and retain that identification until the inventory is sold. Once the specific book(or inventory) is sold, the cost of the specific book is assigned to cost of goods sold. It's pretty similar to your phone number. You are on the records each time you send messages, calling someone, or even doing purchases on your phone. With advanced information technology, computers and programs generate a barcode for each book, to identify each specific book. It's not impossible, but the problem is that does it is necessary and greater than the other methods we just described? If so, for instance, every coffee you order in Starbucks will have its own name, not the name on the menu, a real name. It needs tons of storage space and cloud computing. All of these cost money and make no sense to be an improvement in the financial report and management. Therefore, specific identification is suggested only used for uniquely identifiable goods that have a fairly high per-unit cost (Luxury cars, fine jewelry, or houses ).
The Perpetual or The Periodic System?
Whether the approach is perpetual or periodic, the financial statement results are the same. This is anticipated because the beginning inventory and early purchases are being allocated and charged to cost of goods sold in the same order. The difference is the calculations are done as soon as you click the button (perpetual) or at the time you prepare to report (periodic). Similar to the cloud sync function, it automatically syncs the data you just edit on your devices.
With tons of books to manage, I would advise them to use the perpetual system. Because it's an efficient one for managing such a huge bookstore who has so many books in stock.
The Lower of Cost or Market Technique
Before we decide to adjust the value and apply any method, we need to know the reason why we do this first. Start with the net realizable value (NRV), it helps us to know how worthy is the inventory when we convert it to cash. Assume that you are trying to sell your iPhone XR, and you post it on Amazon.com. Two weeks later, the iPhone XR sold and you get paid from the buyer. You convert your iPhone XR to the cash you get.
We all want to keep the value forever after we purchase expensive goods. Unfortunately, obsolescence, oversupply, defects, and major price declines all cause the prices to decline. As this happens, your inventory is carried on the accounting records at greater than its net realizable value (NRV). To truly reflect the value, some adjustments are necessary. For instance, if you have 1,000 phonebooks in stock and you want to convert it to cash. The NRV would be very different when you value it in 1950 and 2020.
Overall, books are consist of knowledge, papers, and inks. Knowledge can be replaced by the electronic version but papers and inks are the special physical appearance of traditional books. The electronic version of books might be way cheaper than physical books, but in the real world, people prefer physical books, even though they have to pay more money.
To apply the lower of cost or market rule means a business must record the cost of inventory at whichever cost is lower – the original cost or its current market price. Assume that Eslite Bookstore Imports resells five listed books. At the end of its reporting year, Eslite calculates the lower of its cost or net realizable value as the following table:
Merchandise | Quantity on Hand | Unit Cost | Inventory at Cost | Market per Unit | Lower of Cost or Market |
Herry Porter | 1,000 | $19 | $19,000 | $23 | $19,000 |
Don Quixote | 750 | $14 | $10,500 | $17 | $10,500 |
The Little Prince | 200 | $14 | $2,800 | $12 | $2,400 |
Rich dad, Poor dad | 1,200 | $28 | $33,600 | $16 | $19,200 |
A Tale of Two Cities | 800 | $20 | $16,000 | $22 | $16,000 |
Based on the table, the market value is lower than the cost on The Little Prince and Rich dad, Poor dad. Therefore, Eslite Bookstore recognizes a loss on The Little Prince of $400 ($2,800 - $2,400), as well as a loss of $14,400 ($33,600 - $19,200) on the Rich dad, Poor dad.
Reference
Chapter 8: Inventory. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.principlesofaccounting.com/chapter-8/